data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3dc3/f3dc3a309eae24a99ff7f2d9bd17a32578687da4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/861ed/861ed86e3d9b349a6a61af5d014307f57056a343" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2441c/2441c7de878e77273cce6168a5bcdadb931e30c1" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b896c/b896cca753122b79a68a2e27ae2d3d5f7f030acc" alt=""
The beauty of lineage is that it tells you more than you should know. The figures entangled in their own lines, buried in a mass of accidents, undefined by the very form that describes them, tell us the story. The narrative, the line, the hermeneutic* identity of what would-have-been, all this appears to us if we go beyond the simple drawing of havoc. But can we actually defend this as a principle? Maybe not, but in pragmatic terms, if even the site invites us to a general, overall lecture, to a combining of various phases of Research, then I say, hey, go for it, beyond the Pandorra's box of a depressing painting, into the line that completes it, giving it an entire universe to refer to.
*I can't believe I'm actually using this creepy word...