Thursday, December 31, 2009
Happy New Year 2010
Goodbye, gentle soul
But when he starts shedding just before the summer months, we would get him shaved. And long into the rainy season, we kept him short-haired until the days started getting cool again.
At 15 years old, Siopao had a lot of health problems (liver, gall bladder) and was easily prone to infections. His eyesight, hearing and sense of smell had all weakened—except when we had chicken, his favorite (that one he didn't have any difficulty smelling!). In the early morning of November 24, 2009 Siopao passed away while he was at the pet hospital. I still miss his greeting when I get home, and his constant, quiet presence by my side, but I am thankful for the many years that were given to us to be able to love him. And to Jilly and Rob, thank you for your sympathy and comforting words the week after he left us. (ALL PHOTOS BY DOGBERRY)
What are the changes that City Daily Photo bloggers around the world have seen or experienced? Click here to view thumbnails for all participants.
What's for 2010 ?
In order to improve this graffiti blog in 2010, please send me your suggestions.
Gas Masks
Wednesday, December 30, 2009
Have some pie
Nurses During Flu Pandemic of 1918
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
Historical Fiction Reading Challenge 2010
Challenge Outline:
1. Anyone can join. You don't need a blog to participate.
--Non-Bloggers: Include your information in the comment section.
2. There are four levels:
-- Curious – Read 3 Historical Fiction novels.
-- Fascinated – Read 6 Historical Fiction novels.
-- Addicted – Read 12 Historical Fiction novels.
-- Obsessed – Read 20 Historical Fiction novels.
3. Any book format counts.
4. You can list your books in advance or just put them in a wrap up post. If you list them, feel free to change them as the mood takes you.
5. Challenge begins January 1st thru December, 2010.
Challenge Host/Link: Royal Reviews: Historical Fiction Challenge (you can sign up at this location)
------------------------------------------------
My goal: Level Obsessed.
Progress so far: 16/20
Links to my reviews of these challenge books:
- Outlander by Diana Gabaldon
- The Queen's Mistake: In the Court of Henry VIII by Diane Haeger
- The Last Queen by C.W. Gortner
- The Boleyn Wife by Brandy Purdy
- Island of the Swans by Ciji Ware
- Alice I Have Been by Melanie Benjamin
- The Queen's Governess by Karen Harper
- The Secret of the Glass by Donna Russo Morin
- The Scarlet Lion by Elizabeth Chadwick
- The Stolen Crown by Susan Higginbotham
- Secrets of the Tudor Court: Between Two Queens by Kate Emerson
- O, Juliet by Robix Maxwell
- The Highest Stakes by Emery Lee
- Cleopatra's Daughter by Michelle Moran
- Within the Hollow Crown by Margaret Campbell Barnes
- Mistress of Rome by Kate Quinn
- The Queen's Pawn by Christy English
- The Darcy Cousins by Monica Fairview
- The Botticelli Secret by Marina Firoato
- The Rules of Gentility by Janet Mullany
- Claude and Camille by Stephanie Cowell
- The Brothers of Gwynedd by Edith Pargeter
- The Dark Rose by Cynthia Harrod-Eagles
Squiggly
Christmas Eve in Santa Fe
I had the most wonderful vacation involving green tea, DH doing all the cooking, and reading many books on my Kindle. My one fiber-related Christmas gift was a beautiful Nordstrom cashmere scarf in my favorite color. It is actually a men's scarf but I like my scarves really long. (In case you're wondering what on earth I'm reading about mashed potato protests, it is The Food of a Younger Land by Mark Kurlansky.)
I started the pretty Cross-Country Ski Hat from Norwegian Handknits but even using the same weight yarn and a smaller size needle, my gauge was way off. I could have easily omitted one 26 st pattern repeat and still have had a pretty large hat. The Ravelry pattern page also states there is a chart error so if I attempt another project from the book I'll check the pattern errata first.
Here are some Christmas Eve photos from Santa Fe.
The Splendorous Form of Noise
The above is a compilation of works by the Swiss artist Zimoun.
1. Funny, one keeps telling oneself, enough of the minimal already, somehow feeling that less is a bore should be embraced, and the outrageously overflowing art of the recent years - appreciated and encouraged. And then, something like this appears, and it's irresistible. We've seen things from this universe before, also on this blog, and yet, the simplicity, yes, the damn purity takes over again.
2. I had a chance, recently, to visit several large factories. There were wonders there that could probably match most of the things on this video. Yet there was one thing they couldn't do: be useless. It's the sheer uselessness of it that gives it the power. We are not attached to anything but the thing. Art as the thing-that-cannot-be-used? Not necessarily, not in some purist sense. Great industrial design is to be cherished. And yet, there is a level of insanity here, of out-of-this-world-ness, that takes us to an exotic land, allowing for the silliest and most delicious connections to be made.
3. Luxury requires waste. A truly luxurious lifestyle is one where perfectly good things get wasted, as if to outplay their natural use and dying away. The true master of luxury seems to be saying her opulence is so great, the very perseverence of things is no match - they lose their original function and only exist to the extent they are participating in this out-of-this-world-ness of luxury.
You know what I'm aiming at? Here's the hypothesis:
4. This, this minimalist joyful pleasure-making, is the true luxury. Not the apparent richness of the new complexities. In the world of useless purity, everything only serves the joy of simple aesthetic pleasure. More complex works are not quite like that - they have an inner game to play. The elements enter a dialogue, start relations and societies, with their conflicts and functions and disruptions. Here, there is only the ping of a shot of pleasure. This engine moves nothing. It is here to make me smile (or bring inspiration, or scare) - and I turn it off as soon as I have. And don't be mistaken - if I had one of those and got bored with and could afford it, it would go to waste.
4a. Ah, you might say, but the truly great art is one we don't get bored with. Possibly. Yet how often do we actually go back to contemplate (not just think about or admire or analyze) a work of contemporary "minimalist" art? Does it mean it's because it's not that great? What if it's about something else? What if it is an element of luxury, a game we play with ourselves, to feel the exquisite taste of the sophisticated dish, and then to ditch it as soon as we're fed up? It wouldn't be a question of bluff, of fakeness, of shallowness. It would be a question of use. Of why we crave it, this new. Of how we make it useful after all.
David Foldvari, Wrestler
(via)
World War I Nurse
Monday, December 28, 2009
Sherlock Holmes...Old story, new look.
"The game is afoot" or should I say movie? This Christmas, Hollywood gave us the present of Sherlock Holmes, staring Robert Downey Jr., Jude Law, and Rachel McAdams. This movie is a fast paced, high action adventure that never slows down. With some humorous banter between Holmes and Watson and the unquestionable good looks of Holmes this movie would seem to have it all...
When first hearing that there was going to be a new Sherlock Holmes movie, I was ecstatic. Then when I saw the trailer I became a little wary of what they had done to the Holmes character. There have been so many adaptions of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes, but this one is by far the most edgy and loose interpretation. This is no suave and methodical Holmes, playing the violin in thoughtful silence. Instead he is more brawn then brains; from beating up villains with fists and sticks to wearing nothing but his pantaloons while participating in a boxing match.
- Here are some comparisons between the new Sherlock Holmes and the original.
New Version- Robert Downey Jr.
Original Version- Basil Rathbone
Overall it is really a good movie, as long as you look at it with an open mind. If I compare the original and new version, I prefer the Sherlock Holmes played by Basil Rathbone in every way possible. Yet if I view this movie as if it's the first Sherlock Holmes movie I have ever seen and let it stand completely alone, it becomes a good movie.
Hopefully the rumored sequel will be more true to the original...even if just a bit.